Response of Official Spokesperson (Ministry of External Affairs) to a question on the Report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on “The human rights situation in Kashmir”. [June 14, 2018] Response of Official Spokesperson (Ministry of External Affairs) to a question on the Report by the ..

Response of Official Spokesperson (Ministry of External Affairs) to a question on the Report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on “The human rights situation in Kashmir”. [June 14, 2018]

Response of Official Spokesperson (Ministry of External Affairs) to a question on the Report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on “The human rights situation in Kashmir”. [June 14, 2018]

In response to a question on the Report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on "The human rights situation in Kashmir”, the Official Spokesperson said:

  2. "India rejects the report. It is fallacious, tendentious and motivated. We question the intent in bringing out such a report.

 3. It is a selective compilation of largely unverified information. It is overtly prejudiced and seeks to build a false narrative.

 4. The report violates India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The entire state of Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. Pakistan is in illegal and forcible occupation of a part of the Indian state through aggression. We have repeatedly called upon Pakistan to vacate the occupied territories. The incorrect description of Indian territory in the report is mischievous, misleading and unacceptable. There are no entities such as "Azad Jammu and Kashmir” and "Gilgit-Baltistan,”

 5. Terrorism is the most egregious violation of human rights. Yet the authors have conveniently ignored the pattern of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan and territories under its illegal control. Cross-border terror and incitement is aimed at suppressing the will of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, disrupting its political and social fabric and undermining India’s integrity.

6. It is disturbing that those behind this report have chosen to describe internationally designated and UN-proscribed terrorist entities as "armed groups” and terrorists as "leaders”. This undermines the UN led consensus on zero tolerance to terrorism.

 7. The motivated report deliberately ignores that fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution to every Indian citizen, including in the state of Jammu & Kashmir, are protected also by an independent judiciary, human rights commissions, free and vibrant media and an active civil society.

 8. Our protest and views in the matter have been conveyed unequivocally to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. We are deeply concerned that individual prejudices are being allowed to undermine the credibility of a UN institution. 

 9. Such malicious reports cannot undermine the will of the people and the Government of India to take all measures necessary to protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country from cross border terrorism."

****